Legal Opinion

Mitchell v. . Brown

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 5, 1883PublishedCited by 24 opinions

EjectjíENT tried at Spring Term, 1882, of Iredell* Superior Court, before Pure, J. The plaintiff appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, C. J.

The complaint alleges the plaintiff to be owner and entitled to the possession of three contiguous tracts of land, each of which is particularly defined and described, containing in the whole one hundred and nineteen acres, and unlawfully withheld by the defendant, and asserts his right to recover the same with compensation for detention and waste committed.

The answer admits the defendant to be in possession of a part only of the land embraced in the plaintiff’s boundaries, and, denying his title thereto, avers the same to belong to his father, Henry Brown, who let him into possession, and…

2Cited by24 opinions

  1. Porter v. Western North Carolina RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1887
  2. Patterson v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  3. Turrentine v. . Richmond Davidson RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1885
  4. Morrison v. . WatsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1886
  5. Stern v. BenbowSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1909

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API