Panag v. Farmers Insurance
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMadsen, J.
¶1 — These consolidated cases present the issue whether the Consumer Protection Act (CPA), chapter 19.86 RCW, applies to a collection agency’s allegedly deceptive efforts to collect on an insurance company’s subrogation claim against an underinsured motorist. Petitioners, Credit Control Services and its client insurance companies, contend persons who receive allegedly deceptive insurance subrogation collection notices lack standing to bring a CPA claim because the CPA applies only to disputes arising from a consumer or business transaction, not an alleged tort. Petitioners also contend the…
2Cases cited80 opinions
- Reiter v. Sonotone Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Reiter v. Sonotone Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Oswego Laborers' Local 214 Pension Fund v. Marine Midland Bank, N. A.New York Court of Appeals · 1995
- Hangman Ridge Training Stables, Inc. v. Safeco Title InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1986
- Heintz v. JenkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State Of Washington, Resp/x-app v. The Mandatory Poster Agency Inc, Apps/x-respsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2017