Legal Opinion

State Of Washington, Resp/x-app v. The Mandatory Poster Agency Inc, Apps/x-resps

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided July 3, 2017No. 74978-1-IPublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtVerellen, C.J.

¶1 The first element of a Consumer Protection Act (CPA) violation is an unfair or deceptive act or practice. An act is deceptive if it is likely to mislead a reasonable consumer. Such an act satisfies the first element if it has the capacity to deceive a substantial portion of the public. When the underlying facts are undisputed, the question whether the acts are likely to mislead—an objective inquiry—is a question of law. Whether such a deception has the capacity to reach a substantial portion of the public is a question of fact precluding summary judgment, unless the undisputed facts…

2Cases cited63 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. BMW of North America, Inc. v. GoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. CampbellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  4. Hangman Ridge Training Stables, Inc. v. Safeco Title InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1986
  5. United States v. ITT Continental Baking Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975

58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State Of Washington v. Living Essentials, Llc, Et Ano.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2019
  2. State Of Washington v. LA Investors, LLCCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2018
  3. Tvi, Inc., V. State Of WashingtonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2021
  4. Rebecca Thorley & Monica Baxter v. Donald E. Nowlin, et uxCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2024
  5. State Of Washington, V. Meta Platforms, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2024

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API