State Of Washington, Resp/x-app v. The Mandatory Poster Agency Inc, Apps/x-resps
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtVerellen, C.J.
¶1 The first element of a Consumer Protection Act (CPA) violation is an unfair or deceptive act or practice. An act is deceptive if it is likely to mislead a reasonable consumer. Such an act satisfies the first element if it has the capacity to deceive a substantial portion of the public. When the underlying facts are undisputed, the question whether the acts are likely to mislead—an objective inquiry—is a question of law. Whether such a deception has the capacity to reach a substantial portion of the public is a question of fact precluding summary judgment, unless the undisputed facts…
2Cases cited63 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- BMW of North America, Inc. v. GoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. CampbellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Hangman Ridge Training Stables, Inc. v. Safeco Title InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1986
- United States v. ITT Continental Baking Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- State Of Washington v. Living Essentials, Llc, Et Ano.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2019
- State Of Washington v. LA Investors, LLCCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2018
- Tvi, Inc., V. State Of WashingtonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2021
- Rebecca Thorley & Monica Baxter v. Donald E. Nowlin, et uxCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2024
- State Of Washington, V. Meta Platforms, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2024
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.