State v. Cormier
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Opinion of the CourtSaufley, C.J.
[¶ 1] When a motor vehicle collision is so severe that people are killed or may die, Maine law requires law enforcement officials to test the blood of all drivers for intoxicants. 29-A M.R.S. § 2522(1), (2) (2006). This appeal requires us to determine whether the statute’s procedures, which in some instances allow the admission of those blood test results in a criminal trial of the driver, 29-A M.R.S. § 2522(3) (2006), violate the Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution.
[¶ 2] Specifically, the State appeals from a judgment of the Superior Court (Cumberland County, Fritzsche, J.)…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Mincey v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Nix v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Skinner v. Railway Labor Executives' Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- State v. NadeauSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2010
- State v. HutchinsonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2009
- State of Maine v. John E. ArndtSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2016
- State of Maine v. Randall J. WeddleSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2020
- State of Maine v. Rowe L. PalmerSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2018
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.