Legal Opinion

State v. Cormier

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided August 14, 2007PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSaufley, C.J.

[¶ 1] When a motor vehicle collision is so severe that people are killed or may die, Maine law requires law enforcement officials to test the blood of all drivers for intoxicants. 29-A M.R.S. § 2522(1), (2) (2006). This appeal requires us to determine whether the statute’s procedures, which in some instances allow the admission of those blood test results in a criminal trial of the driver, 29-A M.R.S. § 2522(3) (2006), violate the Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution.

[¶ 2] Specifically, the State appeals from a judgment of the Superior Court (Cumberland County, Fritzsche, J.)…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Mincey v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Nix v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Skinner v. Railway Labor Executives' Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. NadeauSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2010
  2. State v. HutchinsonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2009
  3. State of Maine v. John E. ArndtSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2016
  4. State of Maine v. Randall J. WeddleSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2020
  5. State of Maine v. Rowe L. PalmerSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2018

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API