Legal Opinion

State v. Bicknell

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided May 20, 2004No. 29085, 29087PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EISMANN, Justice.

These are appeals from orders suppressing evidence obtained pursuant to a search warrant on the ground that the search warrant was invalid because it was based upon an affidavit of a Washington State Patrol Detective that had been notarized by a notary public rather than signed in front of the magistrate judge. We reverse the orders suppressing evidence and remand these cases for further proceedings.

I. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

On March 15, 2002, a Rathdrum police officer appeared before a magistrate judge seeking a search warrant for evidence related to the crime of…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania Bd. of Probation and Parole v. ScottSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  2. United States v. William D. TurnerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
  3. State v. BottelsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1981
  4. State v. LewisIdaho Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Stockwell v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 1977

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. Leotis B. Branigh, IIIIdaho Court of Appeals · 2013
  2. State v. Alesha Ann GreenIdaho Supreme Court · 2015
  3. Izaguirre v. R & L Carriers Shared Services, LLCIdaho Supreme Court · 2013
  4. State v. ZuegerIdaho Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Terry Smith v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2013

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API