State Ex Rel. Romley v. Superior Court
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CONTRERAS, Presiding Judge.
After conducting a hearing on the state’s motion to transfer a juvenile for prosecution as an adult, the juvenile court ordered that the hearing be continued for six months to give the juvenile a chance to improve his behavior before the court issued its decision. The state sought special action review of the order. We accepted jurisdiction and ordered the juvenile court to immediately determine whether the juvenile was to be transferred for prosecution as an adult. We stated that a written decision would be issued in due course. This is that decision.
FACTUAL…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Arizona Bd. of Regents for and on Behalf of University of Arizona v. State Ex Rel. State, Public Safety Retirement Fund Manager AdministratorCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1989
- State Ex Rel. Romley v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1991
- Lewis v. WarnerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1990
- In Re the Appeal in Maricopa County, Juvenile Action No. J-81405-SArizona Supreme Court · 1979
- In Re the Appeal in Maricopa County, Juvenile Action No. JT-295003Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1980
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- American Family Mutual Insurance v. GrantCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
- STATE EX REL. MONTGOMERY v. WhittenCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2011
- Sanchez v. GamaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2013
- Campbell v. BartonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
- In re Mario L.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1997
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.