Legal Opinion

Baker v. Eighth Judicial District Court of Nevada

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided June 5, 2000No. 34997PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

SUMMARY

The underlying action arises out of Robert P. Baker’s (“Baker”) one-night stay at the Rio Suite Hotel Casino (“the Rio”). Because Baker believed that the Rio was engaging in false advertising by calling its hotel rooms “suites,” Baker began writing letters to the Rio, demanding that it delete the word “suite” from its advertising and threatening suit. Eventually, the Rio filed a declaratory action in Nevada district court naming Baker as the defendant and seeking a declaration that it was not violating Nevada or California law by its use of the term “suite.” Baker thereafter…

3Cases cited8 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Panavision International, L.P., a Delaware Limited Partnership v. Dennis Toeppen Network Solutions, Inc., a District of Columbia CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
  3. Trump v. Eighth Judicial District CourtNevada Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Mizner v. MiznerNevada Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Priest v. Second Judicial District Court of the State of NevadaNevada Supreme Court · 1988

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by29 opinions

  1. Ogawa v. OgawaNevada Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Arbella Mutual Insurance v. Eighth Judicial District Court of the State of Nevada ex rel. County of ClarkNevada Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Patent Rights Protection Group, LLC v. Video Gaming Technologies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
  4. Consipio Holding, BV v. CarlbergNevada Supreme Court · 2012
  5. Dogra v. LilesNevada Supreme Court · 2013

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API