Legal Opinion

Consipio Holding, BV v. Carlberg

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided August 9, 2012No. 58128PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*456OPINION

By the Court,

Gibbons, J.:

In this appeal, we consider whether Nevada courts can properly exercise personal jurisdiction over nonresident officers and directors who directly harm a Nevada corporation. We conclude that they can. Here, the district court failed to conduct adequate factual analysis to determine whether it could properly exercise personal jurisdiction over the respondents before dismissing the complaint against them. Accordingly, we vacate the dismissal order and remand this matter to the district court for further proceedings.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Appellants Consipio…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Shaffer v. HeitnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. CollegeSource, Inc. v. AcademyOne, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Holcomb Condominium Homeowners' Ass'n v. Stewart Venture, LLCNevada Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Vanguard Piping Systems, Inc. v. Eighth Judicial District Court of the State of Nevada Ex Rel. County of ClarkNevada Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Stisser v. SP Bancorp, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2017
  4. Federal Deposit Insurance v. Banc of America Securities LLCDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2013
  5. Rock Bay, LLC v. Eighth Judicial District Court of the State of Nevada Ex Rel. County of ClarkNevada Supreme Court · 2013

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API