Ryan v. Valencia Gonzales
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Thomas
These two cases present the question whether the incompetence of a state prisoner requires suspension of the prison er’s federal habeas corpus proceedings. We hold that neither 18 U. S. C. § 3599 nor 18 U. S. C. § 4241 provides such a right and that the Courts of Appeals for the Ninth and Sixth Circuits both erred in holding that district courts must stay federal habeas proceedings when petitioners are adjudged incompetent.
I
A
Ernest Valencia Gonzales was convicted by an Arizona jury of felony murder, armed robbery, aggravated assault, first-degree burglary, and theft. The convictions arose…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Harrington v. RichterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Cullen v. PinholsterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Pace v. DiGuglielmoSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Rhines v. WeberSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by199 opinions
- Rehaif v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2019
- Ramirez v. CollierSupreme Court of the United States · 2022
- Mortgage Grader, Inc. v. First Choice Loan Services Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
- Rehaif v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2019
- Jennings v. StephensSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
194 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.