Legal Opinion

Dayton Veneer & Lumber Mills v. Cincinnati, N. O. & T. P. Ry. Co.

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided December 9, 1942No. 9192PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

After a mistrial to a jury, the district court entertained and granted, pursuant to Civil Procedure, rule 50(b), 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c, a motion of the defendant-appellee for a directed verdict.

The cause of action of plaintiff-appellant for damages sustained in the stipulated amount of $52,312.17, from destruction by fire of its lumber mill at Dayton, Tennessee, was grounded upon the alleged negligence of the employees of the appellee railroad company in lighting and in failing to extinguish a grass fire along its right-of-way.

The sole issue here is whether the record contains…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Virginia & S. W. Ry. Co. v. HawkCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1908
  2. Gulf Refining Co. v. Mark C. Walker & Son Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1942
  3. Nashville, C. & St. L. Ry. v. SuttonCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1936
  4. Meador v. Nashville, C. & St. L. Ry.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1941

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Cecil Corley Motor Co., Inc. v. General Motors Corp.District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1974
  2. Freddie Gold and Wife, Goldie Gold, Cross-Appellants v. National Savings Bank of the City of Albany, CrossCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1981
  3. United States v. Gus Saunders, United States of America v. Eloise SaundersCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1964
  4. William S. Walters, Jr. v. First Tennessee Bank, N.A. MemphisCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988
  5. Armstrong v. Commerce Tankers Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1969

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API