Legal Opinion
Meador v. Nashville, C. & St. L. Ry.
Tennessee Supreme Court
Decided March 4, 1941PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice McKinney
Plaintiff instituted this suit against the defendant to recover damages for the alleged wrongful death of her husband, her cause of action being based upon the alleged violation of subsection (4) of section 2628 of the Code, which is as follows:
“Every railroad company shall keep the engineer, fireman, or some other person upon the locomotive, always upon the lookout ahead; and when any person, animal, or other obstruction appears upon the road, the alarm whistle shall be sounded', the brakes put down, and every possible means employed to stop the train and prevent an accident.”
The burden of…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. CooganSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Buckeye Cotton Oil Co. v. CampagnaTennessee Supreme Court · 1922
- De Glopper v. Nashville Railway & Light Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1910
- Stuart's Admr. v. Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912
- Virginia & S. W. Ry. Co. v. HawkCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1908
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Law v. Louisville N.R. Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1943
- Margie Gilreath v. Southern Railway CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1963
- Silcox v. Smith CountyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1972
- Dayton Veneer & Lumber Mills v. Cincinnati, N. O. & T. P. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1942
- Western & Atlantic R. R. v. LandTennessee Supreme Court · 1948
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.