People v. Causley
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtButzel, J.
Because of unusual circumstances we issued an order to show cause why the circuit judge should not have granted a motion to dismiss the information, which charged defendant Causley and others with conspiracy to damage and destroy the poles and wires of the Consumers Power Company, a public utility corporation. As the jury were unable to agree upon a verdict, the testimony given on the trial need not be reviewed.
Defendant advances two arguments in support of his motion to dismiss:
1. Conspiracy is an offense known to the common law. Conspiracy to commit a common-law crime is itself a common-law…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- State v. HayesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1941
- Alderman v. PeopleMichigan Supreme Court · 1857
- State v. MurphySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1938
- People v. TenerowiczMichigan Supreme Court · 1934
- State v. SetterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1889
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- People v. CarterMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
- People v. WilderMichigan Supreme Court · 1981
- People v. DenioMichigan Supreme Court · 1997
- People v. PickettMichigan Supreme Court · 1954
- Hemans v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1947
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.