Legal Opinion

People v. Causley

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 6, 1941No. Calendar 41,141PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtButzel, J.

Because of unusual circumstances we issued an order to show cause why the circuit judge should not have granted a motion to dismiss the information, which charged defendant Causley and others with conspiracy to damage and destroy the poles and wires of the Consumers Power Company, a public utility corporation. As the jury were unable to agree upon a verdict, the testimony given on the trial need not be reviewed.

Defendant advances two arguments in support of his motion to dismiss:

1. Conspiracy is an offense known to the common law. Conspiracy to commit a common-law crime is itself a common-law…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. State v. HayesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1941
  2. Alderman v. PeopleMichigan Supreme Court · 1857
  3. State v. MurphySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1938
  4. People v. TenerowiczMichigan Supreme Court · 1934
  5. State v. SetterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1889

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. People v. CarterMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
  2. People v. WilderMichigan Supreme Court · 1981
  3. People v. DenioMichigan Supreme Court · 1997
  4. People v. PickettMichigan Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Hemans v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1947

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API