Legal Opinion

People v. Tenerowicz

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 6, 1934No. Docket No. 123, Calendar No. 36,507PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNorth, J.

Defendants by indictment were charged with conspiring among themselves and with others to permit the keeping and operating of certain houses of ill-fame in the city of Hamtramck, Wayne county; Michigan. Motions to quash were denied. On trial by jury defendants were convicted and they have appealed.

This is the first question presented by appellants: Is the indictment defective in not charging any offense known to the law; and is it sufficiently informative as to the nature of the accusation? The indictment contains two counts, but by reason of dismissal of the second count we are presently…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Wong Tai v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  2. Williamson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  3. People v. BogdanoffNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
  4. People v. McKinneyMichigan Supreme Court · 1862
  5. Alderman v. PeopleMichigan Supreme Court · 1857

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. Lorenson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  2. People v. McCreaMichigan Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Ward v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1981
  4. United States v. PerlsteinCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1942
  5. People v. JohnsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1986

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API