Legal Opinion

In Re Petro Fill, Inc.

United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided August 19, 1992No. 17-10734PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

BERNARD MARKOVITZ, Bankruptcy Judge.

Alleged debtor, Petro Fill, Inc., seeks to have an involuntary chapter 7 petition brought against it dismissed and to recover its costs and attorney’s fees from petitioning creditors. Petro Fill denies that petitioning creditors have standing to bring the petition and insists that it generally is paying its debts as they become due.

Petitioning creditors maintain that all of the requirements for bringing an involuntary petition have been met.

The involuntary petition will be dismissed for reasons set forth below. However, Petro Fill’s…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In Re All Media Properties, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Texas · 1980
  2. Bartmann v. Maverick Tube Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
  3. In Re Central Hobron AssociatesDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1984
  4. In Re McDonald Trucking Co., Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1987
  5. In Re KassUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. · 1990

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. In Re NorrisUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1995
  2. Society of Lloyd's v. Harmsen (In Re Harmsen)Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Tenth Circuit · 2005
  3. In Re Town of Westlake, TexasUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Texas · 1997
  4. In re VitaminspiceUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2012
  5. Deluxe Building Solutions, LLCUnited States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2023

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API