Legal Opinion
PAE Government Services, Inc. v. MPRI, INC.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided December 18, 2007No. 06-56438PublishedCited by 83 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KOZINSKI, Chief Judge:
We consider whether a district court may strike allegations from an amended complaint because they contradict an earlier iteration of the same pleading.
Facts
PAE Government Services, Inc. and MPRI, Inc. sell services to government agencies. The companies agreed to work together to submit a bid for a government contract, and signed a “Teaming Agreement” that divided duties between them. MPRI submitted the bid as “prime contractor” and won. MPRI thereafter refused to subcontract to PAE all the work specified in the Teaming Agreement — or so PAE claimed in its original…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Reddy v. Litton Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Nedlloyd Lines B v. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- Bradley v. Chiron Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by83 opinions
- In re Sony Gaming Networks & Customer Data Security Breach LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2014
- California Sportfishing Protection Alliance v. Shiloh Group, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2017
- Rev Op Group v. ML Manager LLC (In Re Mortgages Ltd.)Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Allied Orthopedic Appliances, Inc. v. Tyco Healthcare Group L.P.District Court, C.D. California · 2007
- Chaconas v. JP Morgan Chase BankDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2010
78 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.