Legal Opinion

Moldenhauer v. Faschingbauer

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided November 24, 1964PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHeffernan, J.

The trial judge saw fit to order a new trial in the interests of justice. The authority of the trial court to do so is set forth in sec. 270.49 (2), Stats. The statute requires that when a new trial is ordered on this ground, the judge shall set forth his reasons in detail.

“Every order granting a new trial shall specify the grounds therefor. In the absence of such specification, the order shall be deemed granted for error on the trial. No order granting a new trial in the interest of justice shall be valid or effective, unless the reasons that prompted the court to make such order are set…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Powers v. Allstate InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Lucas v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Guptill v. RoemerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Dowd v. PalmerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1944
  5. Bradle v. JuutiWisconsin Supreme Court · 1950

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Loomans v. Milwaukee Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Leatherman v. GarzaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
  3. McPhillips v. BlomgrenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Behning v. Star Fireworks Manufacturing Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Gaethke v. PozderCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2017

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API