Legal Opinion
Moldenhauer v. Faschingbauer
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided November 24, 1964PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHeffernan, J.
The trial judge saw fit to order a new trial in the interests of justice. The authority of the trial court to do so is set forth in sec. 270.49 (2), Stats. The statute requires that when a new trial is ordered on this ground, the judge shall set forth his reasons in detail.
“Every order granting a new trial shall specify the grounds therefor. In the absence of such specification, the order shall be deemed granted for error on the trial. No order granting a new trial in the interest of justice shall be valid or effective, unless the reasons that prompted the court to make such order are set…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Powers v. Allstate InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
- Lucas v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
- Guptill v. RoemerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1955
- Dowd v. PalmerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1944
- Bradle v. JuutiWisconsin Supreme Court · 1950
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Loomans v. Milwaukee Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
- Leatherman v. GarzaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
- McPhillips v. BlomgrenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
- Behning v. Star Fireworks Manufacturing Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
- Gaethke v. PozderCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2017
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.