Leatherman v. Garza
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBeilfuss, J.
Three issues are presented for determination :(1) Was the order granting a new trial defective?(2) Was the plaintiff negligent as a matter of law?(3) Is the evidence sufficient to sustain the jury’s finding that the defendant Boileau was negligent?
The order granting the new trial (omitting formal parts) is as follows:
“1. That the verdict herein of September 28, 1967, be and the same is hereby set aside;
“2. That a new trial on the issue of apportionment of causal negligence only is hereby granted, the costs of the former trial to abide the outcome of the action because said verdict is contrary…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Trautmann v. Charles Schefft & Sons Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1930
- DeKeyser v. Milwaukee Automobile InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1940
- Bach v. Liberty Mutual Fire InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
- Home Savings Bank v. GertenbachWisconsin Supreme Court · 1955
- Schilling v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Weiss v. United Fire & Casualty Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1995
- Giese v. Montgomery Ward, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1983
- Jost v. Dairyland Power CooperativeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
- Peeples v. SargentWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
- Millonig v. BakkenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1983
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.