Legal Opinion

Thompson v. Heineman

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided January 9, 2015No. S-14-158Published

1Opinion of the Court

Nebraska Advance Sheets 798 289 NEBRASKA REPORTS CONCLUSION We conclude that the cumulative errors of failing to comply with the provisions of § 27-513, the continued questioning of Nancy after she refused to testify, and the trial court’s refusal to either admonish or instruct the jury not to draw an inference from the invocation of the privilege constitute reversible error. Because the evidence presented by the State was sufficient to sustain Draper’s convictions, we reverse the convictions and remand the cause for a new trial. R eversed and remanded for a new trial. Randy Thompson et al.,…

2Cases cited76 opinions

  1. Pike v. Bruce Church, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Massachusetts v. Environmental Protection AgencySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Sprint Communications Co. v. APCC Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
  4. Susan B. Anthony List v. DriehausSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
  5. Southern Pacific Co. v. Arizona Ex Rel. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1945

71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API