Gibson Bowles, Inc. v. Montgomery
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtGillette, P. J.
Defendant appeals the judgment entered in favor of plaintiff after a trial to the court in this action for a real estate broker’s commission. The trial court made findings of fact, but they did not include all the essential elements of the action. We remand for further findings.
On December 5, 1977, plaintiff and defendant entered into a 90-day exclusive listing agreement for the sale of certain property owned by defendant. That same day a salesperson in plaintiffs office made an offer on the property. That offer was accepted by defendant, and an earnest money agreement was signed on December…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Prall v. GOODEN ET UXOregon Supreme Court · 1961
- Setser v. Commonwealth, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1970
- Briscoe v. PittmanOregon Supreme Court · 1974
- Brown v. GrimmOregon Supreme Court · 1971
- DeHarpport v. GreenOregon Supreme Court · 1959
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Zitzelberger v. SalvatoreSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Lindland v. United Business Investments, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
- Eagle Industries, Inc. v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
- Hildebrandt v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
- Suess Builders Co. v. City of BeavertonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.