Legal Opinion

Warden v. Kerns

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 17, 1925No. 15603PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLester, J.

The plaintiffs in error filed this action for the recovery of SO acres of land in Stephens county, and to cancel a deed executed by Beulah Warden to W. B. Green, and conveyance of the mineral rights executed by Beulah Warden to L. H. Kerns. The parties will be referred to here as plaintiffs and defendants, as they appeared in tibe trial court.

The tract in controversy was located in section 27, and it, together with a tract of 100 acres in section 34, was a portion of the allotment of Beulah Warden, nee Land-rum. The tract in section 27 cornered with the tract in section 34, and the two tracts…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. SpearsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  2. Watkins v. GrieserSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1901
  3. Kerr v. GarrisonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  4. Pierce v. BarksSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. MIDLAND VALLEY RAILROAD COMPANY v. McKeeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1964
  2. Ossmen v. Commercial Credit Corp.Idaho Supreme Court · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API