Legal Opinion

Pierce v. Barks

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 25, 1916No. 7227PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error from County Conrt, Craig County; Edw. H. Brady, Judge. Action by J. E. Barks against M. L. Pierce and another. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendants bring error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

DAY, C.

This was an action tried in the county court, wherein J. E. Barks was plaintiff and M. L. Pierce and C. M. Harvey were defendants, having come to the county court on appeal from a justice of the peace court. The parties shall hereinafter be referred to as they appeared in the trial court. Plaintiff’s bill of particulars charged defendants with the conversion of a buggy and set of harness of the value of $110; that defendants got possession of the buggy under a promise to him to repair said buggy and make good their warranty made by them when he had purchased said buggy from…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Chambers v. Van WagnerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  2. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. SpearsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  3. American Jobbing Ass'n v. JamesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ossmen v. Commercial Credit Corp.Idaho Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Warden v. KernsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API