Legal Opinion

Cockerham v. . Nixon

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided August 5, 1850PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Appeal from the Superior Court of Law of Surry County, at the Spring Term 1850, his Honor Judge Dick presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtPbaeson, J.

This was a case, for an injury done to the plaintiff’s horse by the defendant’s bull. The plaintiff proved, that a bull of the defendant, while running at large, gored his horse and killed it. One Cannady swore, that before the horse was killed, he was giving salt to a cow, when the bull came up — whereupon the bull made after him and forced him to jump on a fence near at hand, and he stated these facts to the defendant and told him, he would have .shot his bull, if he had had a gun.

The Court charged, that it was not necessary to shew, that the defendant had knowledge of a vicious habit of…

2Cited by15 opinions

  1. Andrews v. Smith Et Ux.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  2. Swain v. TillettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  3. State v. . SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
  4. Hill Ex Rel. Hill v. MoseleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
  5. Plumidies v. . SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API