Legal Opinion

Rowe v. Rowe

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 5, 1873PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Certiorari to Eufus H. G-rosveuor, circuit court commissioner of Kalamazooo county.

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiám.

A motion is made to dismiss the writ of certiorari on two grounds: first, because the case is not a proper one for that writ; and second, because it was improvidently granted.

The first point relates to the merits, and should be con-, sidered when the case is argued, and not on this motion. The second is the only one .proper to he discussed now-;, and the ground of objection is that the application for the ■ allowance of the writ was made to a justice of this court, and granted, while a similar application was pending and undetermined before the circuit judge of the county, where…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Daniels v. PeopleMichigan Supreme Court · 1859
  2. Case v. DeanMichigan Supreme Court · 1867
  3. Streeter v. PatonMichigan Supreme Court · 1859
  4. Edgarton v. HinchmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1859
  5. Waldby v. CallendarMichigan Supreme Court · 1860

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Risser v. HoytMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Carter v. GearHawaii Supreme Court · 1904
  3. In re StockmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
  4. In re CrowWisconsin Supreme Court · 1884
  5. Buback v. GovernorMichigan Supreme Court · 1968

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API