In re Stockman
Michigan Supreme Court
Habeas corpus case. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtSherwood, C. J.
Lucile Stockman is now nine years-of age, and resides with her maternal grandparents in Port Huron, who are her guardians in this State, having-received their appointment as such on October 19, 1885. The paternal grandparents reside in Washington, D. 0., and were duly appointed testamentary guardians for Lucile in that city on September 4, 1885. The child’s father- and mother are both dead. The testamentary guardians are the petitioners in this case, and they seek to recover-by the writ of habeas corpus this infant girl from the Michigan guardians. Mrs. Stockman, the mother of Lucile, died in…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Wood v. WoodNew York Court of Chancery · 1836
- Corrie v. CorrieMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
- Morrell v. DickeyNew York Court of Chancery · 1814
- Fenwick v. Sears's AdministratorsSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
- Riley v. RileyU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Connecticut · 1808
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- In Matter of BadgerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1920
- Helton v. CrawleySupreme Court of Iowa · 1950
- Hibbette v. BainesMississippi Supreme Court · 1900
- Boardman v. BoardmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1948
- In Re MathersMichigan Supreme Court · 1963
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.