Legal Opinion
Moran v. Selig
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 9, 2006No. 04-55647PublishedCited by 242 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
REINHARDT, Circuit Judge.
Appellants seek reversal of the district court’s grant of summary judgment on their Title VII and battery claims. We conclude that they have failed to make a prima facie showing of discrimination under Title VII, and to offer evidence of the commission of a battery sufficient to survive summary judgment. With respect to the Title VII claim, we hold in the alternative that appellees had a legitimate nondiscriminatory reason for the actions they took and that such reason was non-pretex-tual. Accordingly, we affirm.
I
In October 2003, Mike Colbern, a retired Major League…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- McDonald v. Santa Fe Trail Transportation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Edward E. ERCEGOVICH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER COMPANY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
- Cobbs v. GrantCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by242 opinions
- Jacqueline Lewis v. City of Union City, GeorgiaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2019
- Anthoine v. North Central Counties ConsortiumCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- David Weil v. Citizens Telecom Services Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
- Beck v. United Food and Commercial Workers UnionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Nicholson v. Hyannis Air Service, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
237 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.