Legal Opinion

Canfield v. Gill

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided April 4, 1985No. 15111PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

This is an appeal from a judgment for respondent following a bench trial on appellant’s complaint for breach of contract. For the reasons stated below, we reverse.

On May 25, 1982, Canfield and Gill executed a document entitled “Sales Agreement and Deposit Receipt.” On its face the document was a sales contract for the sale of Canfield’s business, The Lone Arranger, which specializes in silk and dry flower arrangements.

The document set forth a purchase price of $14,000, with a $500 deposit. The $13,500 balance was expressly due and payable no later than August 1, 1982. The sale of the…

3Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Old Aztec Mine, Inc. v. BrownNevada Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Round Hill General Improvement District v. NewmanNevada Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Mohr Park Manor, Inc. v. MohrNevada Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Buchanan v. BuchananNevada Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Avery v. GilliamNevada Supreme Court · 1981

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by7 opinions

  1. Margrave v. Dermody Properties, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Tipton v. HeerenNevada Supreme Court · 1993
  3. M & R Investment Co. v. GoldsberryNevada Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Deshler v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Estate of Travis v. Special AdministratorsNevada Supreme Court · 1986

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API