Estate of Travis v. Special Administrators
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
*434OPINION
2Per curiam
Appellant, Velma Ruth Fury, appeals from an order of the district court compelling her to sign a claim compromise. Fury asserts that the compromise included terms to which the parties had not agreed. Because we agree that the district court was without authority to compel or force a compromise, we reverse.
Before her death in 1983, Violet Mae Travis sued her daughter (Fury) in federal court to recover interests in property previously conveyed. After Travis,’ death, the special administrators of her estate were substituted as plaintiffs in Travis’ action. Additionally, Fury filed a will…
3Cases cited3 opinions
- Dolge v. MasekNevada Supreme Court · 1954
- Tropicana Hotel Corp. v. SpeerNevada Supreme Court · 1985
- Canfield v. GillNevada Supreme Court · 1985
4Cited by1 opinion
- MacK v. Estate of MacKNevada Supreme Court · 2009