Legal Opinion

Estate of Travis v. Special Administrators

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided September 24, 1986No. 16603PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

*434OPINION

2Per curiam

Appellant, Velma Ruth Fury, appeals from an order of the district court compelling her to sign a claim compromise. Fury asserts that the compromise included terms to which the parties had not agreed. Because we agree that the district court was without authority to compel or force a compromise, we reverse.

Before her death in 1983, Violet Mae Travis sued her daughter (Fury) in federal court to recover interests in property previously conveyed. After Travis,’ death, the special administrators of her estate were substituted as plaintiffs in Travis’ action. Additionally, Fury filed a will…

3Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Dolge v. MasekNevada Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Tropicana Hotel Corp. v. SpeerNevada Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Canfield v. GillNevada Supreme Court · 1985

4Cited by1 opinion

  1. MacK v. Estate of MacKNevada Supreme Court · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API