Legal Opinion

Gillette v. Lanier

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided October 19, 1965No. 1 CA-CIV 71PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAMERON, Judge.

The appellee, plaintiff below, Lanier, obtained a judgment in the amount of $21,000, plus costs and attorney’s fees, against the appellants, defendants below. Neither the defendants nor their attorney appeared at the trial. Defendants filed a motion to set aside the entry of judgment which was ordered denied. From said order, defendants bring this appeal.

We are called upon to determine whether the trial court below abused its discretion in denying the motion based upon Rule 60(c), Rules of Civil Procedure, 16 A.R.S., where a defendant has allegedly had a judgment taken against…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Fisk v. BakerIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
  2. Aetna Securities Co. v. SickelsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1949
  3. Thomas v. Goettl Bros. Metal Products, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Coulas v. SmithArizona Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Marsh v. RiskasArizona Supreme Court · 1951

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Springfield Credit Union v. JohnsonArizona Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Kohlbeck v. HandleyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1966
  3. Health for Life Brands, Inc. v. PowleyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2002
  4. C. Meisel Music Company v. PerlCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1966
  5. Hawke v. BellCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1983

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API