Legal Opinion

Gray v. WACKENHUT SERVICES, INC.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided June 25, 2010No. 08 Civ. 3233PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SWEET, District Judge.

The defendants Wackenhut Services, Incorporated (“Wackenhut”), Alutiiq Security and Technology, LLC (“Alutiiq”) and Afognak Native Corporation (“Afognak”) (collectively, the “Defendants”) have moved under Rule 56(b), Fed.R.Civ.P., to dismiss the complaint of Gwendolyn Gray (“Gray” or the “Plaintiff’) seeking damages for personal injury she suffered when the car she was driving struck the steel plate barrier which barred access to the United States Military Academy at West Point (“West Point”). Upon the findings and conclusions set forth below, the motion is…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Palsgraf v. Long Island R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
  4. Espinal v. Melville Snow Contractors, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 2002
  5. H. R. Moch Co. v. Rensselaer Water Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Dilworth v. GoldbergDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2012
  2. Naughright v. WeissDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2012
  3. Sidik v. Royal Sovereign Int'l Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2018
  4. Qishen Xue v. The Trustees of Columbia University in the City of New York, et al.District Court, S.D. New York · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API