Legal Opinion
Naughright v. Weiss
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided March 8, 2012No. 10 Civ. 8451PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
Defendants Donna Karan Weiss (“Karan”) and Urban Zen, LLC (“Urban Zen”) (collectively, the “Karan Defendants”) have filed a motion, pursuant to Fed. R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6), to dismiss the Amended Complaint (the “Amended Complaint”) filed by Plaintiff Jamie A. Naughright (“Naughright” or the “Plaintiff’). Defendant Stephen M. Robbins (“Robbins” and, collectively with the Karan Defendants, the “Defendants”) has also filed a motion to dismiss pursuant to the same rule. Based on the conclusions set forth below, the motions to dismiss are granted in part and denied in part.
P…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Ben Gary Triestman v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
- Chambers v. Time Warner, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Hulett v. City of SyracuseDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2017
- Candelaria v. Conopco, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2023
- Carroll v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2023
- Demand Electric Inc. v. Innovative TechnologyHoldings, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2023
- Elizabeth Kream, M.D. v. Navaderm Partners LLC, et al.District Court, S.D. New York · 2026
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.