Legal Opinion

Hagan v. Riddle Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 9, 1923No. 8 Div. 519PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.

The cause was submitted on demurrer to the original bill, having for its purpose the enforcement of a materialman’s lien.

The averments of facts as to advisability of consolidation of the instant suit with the other pending causes to like effect in the same court, did not destroy the equity of the bill, or prevent the court, in the exercise of a sound discretion and in a proper case, from ordering consolidation or hearing the causes at the same time “without the consent of the parties thereto.” Ex parte Brown, 58 Ala. 536.

The lien claimed and filed in the probate office shows that the sale was…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Redd Bros. v. ToddSupreme Court of Alabama · 1922
  2. Ex parte BrownSupreme Court of Alabama · 1877
  3. Gilbert v. Talladega Hardware Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1915
  4. Pilcher v. E. R. Porter Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1922
  5. Southern Ry. Co. v. ClarkeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1919

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Ex Parte AshtonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
  2. Evans v. EvansSupreme Court of Alabama · 1955
  3. Standard Sanitary Mfg. Co. v. AirdSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930
  4. Gorr Lumber Co. v. McMillanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
  5. Baldwin v. ConstantineSupreme Court of Alabama · 1926

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API