Pilcher v. E. R. Porter Co.
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the CourtSomerville, J.
With respect to the relative rights of lienors and prior mortgagees, under sections 4754 and 4755 of the Code, declaring and defining the liens of mechanics and, materialmen, and the remedies for their enforcement, the following propositions seem to be clearly settled by our decisions:
1. Where a new building or. structure is erected on land which is already subject to a mortgage or other incumbrance, as to the land, the lien is subordinate to the prior incumbrance, hut, as to the building or structure, • the lien is superior to such incumbrance; the theory being that, so far as the lienor is…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Fowler v. Alabama Iron & Steel Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1910
- Wimberly v. Mayberry & Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1891
- Cocciola v. Wood-Dickerson Supply Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1902
- Jefferson County Savings Bank v. Ben F. Barbour P. & E. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1915
- Turner v. RobbinsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1885
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Bailey Mortg. Co. v. Gobble-Fite Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1990
- Sturdavant v. First Ave. Coal & Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1929
- Becker Roofing Co. v. WysingerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
- Jackson v. FarleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1925
- Central Lumber Co. v. JacksSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.