Redd Bros. v. Todd
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.
The suit was to enforce a materialman’s lien on buildings constructed from material alleged to be furnished to the owner. Complainant was an original contractor within the terms of the statute. Gilbert v. Talladega Hdw. Co., 195 Ala. 474, 70 South. 660; Wahouma Drug Co. v. Kirkpatrick, etc., Co., 187 Ala. 318, 65 South. 825; Trammell v. Hudmon, 78 Ala. 222.
The method pursued in order and delivery of material was that, in ordering the material for the separate houses, respondent would designate what was desired and where to be delivered. Thereupon complainant entered the order on a ticket…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Aeschlimann v. . Presbyterian HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
- Lane & Bodley Co. v. JonesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1885
- Alabama Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. Alabama Penny Sav. BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
- Gilbert v. Talladega Hardware Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1915
- Montgomery Bank & Trust Co. v. JacksonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1914
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Dewberry v. Bank of Standing RockSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
- Clark v. WhitfieldSupreme Court of Alabama · 1925
- McNeil v. Ritter Dental Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1925
- Richardson Lumber Co. v. HowellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
- Morris v. Bessemer Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1928
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.