Legal Opinion

Andrus v. State

Utah Supreme Court

Decided September 5, 1975No. 13716PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TUCKETT, Justice:

The plaintiffs initiated these proceedings in the District Court of Salt Lake County wherein they seek to recover for damage sustained by their properties from flood *1119waters and gravel and other debris being deposited thereon. Three separate actions were consolidated in the court below based upon damages which occurred in two separate storms on April 3, 1969, and August 17, 1969. By order of the court the issues of liability were ordered tried separately and the question of damages reserved for a subsequent hearing.

The plaintiffs in this action are all home owners residing in…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Sanford v. University of UtahUtah Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Wood v. Foster & Creighton Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Leininger v. Stearns-Roger Manufacturing CompanyUtah Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Marin Municipal Water District v. Peninsula Paving Co.California Court of Appeal · 1939
  5. Southeast Construction Co. v. EllisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1961

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Lewis v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa · 1977
  2. Colman v. Utah State Land BoardUtah Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Moloso v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Stewart v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Little v. Utah State Division of Family ServicesUtah Supreme Court · 1983

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API