Legal Opinion

United States v. Mashica Spann

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided May 29, 2012No. 11-3623PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

While on probation for a state drug conviction, Mashica Spann met Carlos Hoffman in court-mandated group therapy and joined his heroin-distribution ring. She was indicted in federal court for her role in the operation and pleaded guilty to conspiracy to distribute heroin, see 21 U.S.C. §§ 846, 841(a)(1), a crime that presumptively mandated a minimum prison term of five years because the conspiracy involved 100 or more grams, id. § 841(b)(1)(B). After rejecting Spann’s argument that she was a minimal or minor participant in the crime, see U.S.S.G. § 3B1.2, the district court calculated her…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. United States v. Robert Schuh, Lisa Nolen, and Curtis LaneCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
  4. United States v. Larry D. KnoxCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
  5. United States v. Mattie Lou ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. United States v. ColemanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2017
  2. United States v. EvansCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014
  3. United States v. HollimanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014
  4. United States v. Anthony WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2017
  5. United States v. Escalante-VelazquezCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API