United States v. Holliman
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Deontae Holliman pleaded guilty to possession of a firearm by a felon, see 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1), and was sentenced as an armed career criminal to the statutory minimum of 180 months, see 18 U.S.C. § 924(e)(1). Holliman filed a notice of appeal, but his appointed lawyer has concluded that the appeal is frivolous and seeks to withdraw. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Holliman opposes counsel’s motion. See Cir. R. 51(b). We limit our review to the potential issues identified in counsel’s facially adequate brief and Holli-man’s response.…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- California v. Hodari D.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- United States v. Robert Schuh, Lisa Nolen, and Curtis LaneCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
- United States v. Larry D. KnoxCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
- United States v. Chad KonczakCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- United States v. DortchDistrict Court, E.D. Illinois · 2018