Legal Opinion

State v. Gill

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 2, 1993No. 92-01-95224; CA A73526PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRichardson, C. J.

Appellant challenges a civil commitment order that found her to be mentally ill and released her under certain conditions. ORS 426.125. She argues that the trial court failed to make the necessary findings to establish that she is mentally ill, under ORS 426.005(2). We reverse.

Appellant suffers from schizophrenia and mild retardation. She has a tendency to become agitated and takes medication to stabilize her mental condition. Before hospitalization, she lived with her parents and attended an alternative high school. She was hospitalized because, on two occasions, she hit staff members at a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. O'Neill v. O'NeillOregon Supreme Court · 1976
  2. State v. BrungardCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
  3. State v. BrungardCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
  4. State v. StanleyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
  2. State v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
  3. State v. HerdanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
  4. State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API