Alexander M. v. Hon. abrams/ades
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Justice BRUTINEL,
opinion of the Court.
¶ 1 We are asked to decide whether a juvenile court can delegate discretion to the Arizona Department of Economic Security (“ADES”) to determine when it serves a dependent child’s best interests to be returned to the child’s parent or guardian. We conclude that the juvenile court may not delegate its responsibility to independently determine whether reunification is in the child’s best interests.
I. BACKGROUND
¶ 2 In June 2012, the juvenile court adjudicated Alexander M., Dominic M., Daniel M., Nathanial M., and Savannah M. (the “Children”) dependent as to…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- State v. HansenArizona Supreme Court · 2007
3Cited by8 opinions
- Department of Child Safety v. BeeneCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
- Brionna J. v. Dcs, A.V.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2019
- Brittany W., Ryan W. v. DcsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2018
- Dcs, S.P. v. Juan P.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2018
- Frank G., Annette G. v. DcsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2015
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.