Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Judge

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided June 1, 1995PublishedCited by 108 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAbrams, J.

The defendant appeals from a conviction of murder in the first degree by reason of deliberate premeditation, of extreme atrocity or cruelty, and of felony-murder. He also was convicted of breaking and entering while armed in the nighttime with intent to commit a felony, and of armed robbery while masked. The defendant claims that the trial judge improperly instructed the jury on the third prong of the malice requirement for murder in the first degree and improperly admitted his written confession in evidence. The defendant also asks that we exercise our power under G. L. c. 278, § 33E (1992…

2Cases cited59 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Davis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. McNeil v. WisconsinSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. Minnick v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1990

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by108 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. AzarMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2002
  2. Commonwealth v. SannaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1997
  3. Commonwealth v. WaiteMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1996
  4. Commonwealth v. WoodwardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1998
  5. Commonwealth v. RosaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1996

103 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API