Legal Opinion
Williams v. District of Columbia
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided December 9, 2010No. 09-CV-1192PublishedCited by 62 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THOMPSON, Associate Judge:
On April 8, 2009, appellant Michael Williams filed a complaint against the District of Columbia (“the District”), Mayor Adrian Fenty, and Clark Ray, then-Director of the District of Columbia Department of Parks and Recreation (“DPR”) asserting that he had been terminated from his position with DPR in violation of the District of Columbia Whistleblower Protection Act (“DC-WPA” or “Act”), D.C.Code §§ 1-615.51 to -59 (2001). He also asserted claims for defamation and intentional infliction of emotional distress. The defendants brought a motion to dismiss, which the…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Phillips v. County of AlleghenyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
- Howard University v. BestDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
- Oparaugo v. WattsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005
- Wallace v. Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & FlomDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1998
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by62 opinions
- COMPETITIVE ENTERPRISE INSTITUTE AND RAND SIMBERG v. MICHAEL E. MANN, NATIONAL REVIEW, INC. v. MICHAEL E. MANNDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2016
- Michele Hall v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2017
- Potomac Development Corp. v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2011
- Clayton v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Intelsat USA Sales Corp. v. Juch-Tech, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2013
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.