Oliver v. . Hecht

At the close of plaintiff’s evidence, defendants in the court below made a motion for judgment as in case of nonsuit, C. S., 567. The motion was allowed, and in this we can see no error.

Tbe defendants, in their brief, say: “The testimony of E. L. Oliver with reference to an alleged contract with Charles K. Hecht was objected and excepted to, but those exceptions are not before the court in view of the judgment of nonsuit. The complaint did not allege any such contract, and if it had, the testimony would have been incompetent as parol evidence in contradiction of the written contract, the…