Legal Opinion

Security Pacific National Bank v. Ginkowski

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided June 3, 1987No. 86-1127PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtScott, C.J.

Stanley A. Ginkowski, mortgagor, appeals from a judgment of foreclosure. The trial court held that Security Pacific National Bank, Trustee (Security), a mortgage successor in interest, was entitled to equitable reformation of the mortage document as to the absent signature of Ginkowski. Ginkowski contends that he never signed the mortgage nor intended to sign it. Ginkowski further contends that Security has "unclean hands” and is thus not entitled to equitable relief because an agent of Universal Mortgage Corporation (Universal), Security’s predecessor in interest, had forged Ginkowski’s…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Merten v. NathanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1982
  2. S & M Rotogravure Service, Inc. v. BaerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Nelson v. AlbrechtsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
  4. St. Norbert College Foundation, Inc. v. McCormickWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Sorce v. RinehartWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Smith v. Royal Automotive Group, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
  2. State v. BariteauSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
  3. Lake Bluff Housing Partners v. City of South MilwaukeeCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2001
  4. Prezioso v. AertsCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2014
  5. Timm v. Portage County Drainage DistrictCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1988

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API