Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Richardson

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided December 24, 1928PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Wingate, S.

This matter seems to have proceeded on the wholly wrong theory that if trustees’ accounts show a loss of substantially one-fifth of the corpus of the trust, no explanation is required of them, but the sufferers are under the burden of showing that the loss is due to the trustees’ improper conduct. Such is not the law. Trustees in the face of such a loss are under the burden of showing facts and circumstances to establish they are without fault in the matter. (Underhill v. Newburger, 4 Redf. 499.) On the contrary, evidence as to the financial condition of the bank in whose stocks…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Carrier v. . CarrierNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
  2. Pyle v. PyleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1910
  3. Gould v. GouldNew York Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Underhill v. NewburgerNew York Surrogate's Court · 1881

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Gates v. Plainfield Trust Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1937
  2. In re the Estate of FlintNew York Surrogate's Court · 1933
  3. In re the Estate of GarlandNew York Surrogate's Court · 1936
  4. In re the Judicial Settlement of the Intermediate Account of Proceedings of KruppenbacherAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API