Legal Opinion
State v. Bryce
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided May 26, 1959PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
56 N.J. Super. 83 (1959)
151 A.2d 563
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, AND THE TAX INVESTMENT CORPORATION OF NEW JERSEY, INTERVENING PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
MARY E. BRYCE, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued May 11, 1959.
Additional briefs filed May 18, 1959.
Decided May 26, 1959.
Before Judges GOLDMANN, CONFORD and FREUND.
Mr. Saul A. Wittes argued the cause for intervening plaintiff-appellant, The Tax Investment Corporation of New Jersey.
Mr. Eugene T. Urbaniak, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for plaintiff-respondent (Mr. David D. Furman,…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Den Ex Dem. Murray v. Hoboken Land & Improvement Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1856
- American Surety Co. v. BaldwinSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Covey v. Town of SomersSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Coffin Brothers & Co. v. BennettSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Tumarkin v. FriedmanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Hudson County News Co. v. SillsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1963