Legal Opinion
Tumarkin v. Friedman
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided December 21, 1951PublishedCited by 50 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
17 N.J. Super. 20 (1951)
85 A.2d 304
ALLAN L. TUMARKIN, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
ADOLPH FRIEDMAN, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT, AND MANUFACTURERS CUTTER CORPORATION, DEFENDANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued December 10, 1951.
Decided December 21, 1951.
Before Judges JACOBS, EASTWOOD and BIGELOW.
Mr. Benjamin Gross argued the cause for the appellant (Messrs. Gross & Gross, attorneys).
Mr. Joseph J. Schotland argued the cause for the respondent (Messrs. Sandles & Sandles, attorneys).
The opinion of the court was delivered by JACOBS, S.J.A.D.
The delegates to the Constitutional Convention…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Winberry v. SalisburySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1950
- Massari v. EinsiedlerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1951
- Hogan v. HodgeNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1949
- Ciocca v. HackerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1949
- Heuter v. Coastal Air Lines, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by50 opinions
- Cogdell v. Hospital Center at OrangeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1989
- Olds v. DonnellySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1997
- New Jersey-Philadelphia Presbytery of the Bible Presbyterian Church v. New Jersey State Board of Higher EducationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
- Prevratil v. MohrSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1996
- Handelman v. HandelmanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1954
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.