Legal Opinion

Curtis v. Boquillas Land & Cattle Co.

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided March 20, 1904No. Civil No. 796PublishedCited by 12 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the District Court of the First Judicial District in and for the County of Cochise. Fletcher M. Doan, Judge. On rehearing. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtSloan, J.

Upon the petition of appellants, a rehearing was granted in this case at the last term of the court. The grounds stated in the petition were two: 1. That the findings show that the appellee acquired its title to the property in controversy subsequent to the date of the commencement of the action; and 2. That the findings show that the appellants had held adverse possesion of the lands in controversy for a period exceeding ten years, and that therefore appellee’s right of action was barred under paragraph 2938 of the Revised Statutes of 1901.

Under the first ground, counsel for the appellants…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Ogden v. SaundersSupreme Court of the United States · 1827
  2. Terry v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  3. United States v. HethSupreme Court of the United States · 1806
  4. Sohn v. WatersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
  5. Price v. HopkinMichigan Supreme Court · 1865

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. City of Tucson v. Clear Channel Outdoor, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Gilliland v. RodriquezArizona Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Hinrichs v. Davenport Locomotive WorksSupreme Court of Iowa · 1927
  4. Oregon Home Builders v. Montgomery Inv. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1919
  5. Work v. United Globe MinesArizona Supreme Court · 1909

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API