Legal Opinion

Hinrichs v. Davenport Locomotive Works

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided July 1, 1927PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStevens, J.

I. While claimant was engaged in chipping steel with an air hammer, a piece flew off and hit him in the left eye, causing a slight cut or injury, which, it is claimed, caused a cataract to form, resulting in a total loss of sight in that eye.

Three propositions are argued by appellant:' (a) That no causal connection between the injury and the disability was proven; (b) that the action is barred by the statute of limitations; and (c) that the commissioner erred in permitting appellee to introduce in evidence unsworn testimony without having given the notice required by Section 1447 of the Code…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Pace v. Appanoose CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1918
  2. Flint v. City of EldonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1921
  3. State v. MinesWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Fullerton-Krueger Lumber Co. v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1925
  5. Herbig v. Walton Auto Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1921

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Cedar Rapids Community School District and EMC Insurance Companies v. Christine PeaseSupreme Court of Iowa · 2011
  2. Rose v. John Deere Ottumwa WorksSupreme Court of Iowa · 1956
  3. Almquist v. Shenandoah Nurseries, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1934
  4. Walker v. Speeder MacHinery Corp.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1932
  5. Enfield v. the Certain-Teed Prod. Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1930

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API