Legal Opinion

Continental National Bank v. Stoltz

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 13, 1920No. Civ. No. 3216PublishedCited by 4 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

KNIGHT, J., pro tem.

is an action in interpleader, brought by plaintiff to determine the title to the sum of $2,080, which plaintiff claims to hold in escrow. Judgment was rendered in favor of defendant and cross-complainant W. A. Reed. Defendant Corporate Finance Company, a corporation, appeals, and the appeal is presented on the judgment-roll.

The action was originally commenced against the defendants E. P. Stoltz, Continental Producing Company, a corporation, Robert Goldstein, and S. Goldstein, to require them to interplead and litigate among themselves as to the ownership of said $2,080.…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Coats v. CoatsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Winslow v. GohransenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Jory v. Supreme Council American Legion of HonorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Himmelman v. HenryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Bliss v. SneathCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Pacific Loan Management Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
  2. Westamerica Bank v. City of BerkeleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  3. Hartford Accident & Ind. Co. v. AnkenyOregon Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Kammerer v. MarinoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API