Legal Opinion
Pratter v. Lascoff
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided June 15, 1932PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Judgment affirmed, with costs, on the authority of Liggett Co. v. Baldridge (278 U. S. 105), by which decision we feel bound, inasmuch as we find no facts or circumstances of substance differentiating the'two eases. All concur, except Edgcomb and Thompson, JJ., who dissent and vote for reversal on the law and for dismissal of the complaint upon the reasoning contained in the opinion of Lewis, J., in Hauges v. Lascoff (140 Misc. 811). [140 Misc. 211.]
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Louis K. Liggett Co. v. BaldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Pratter v. LascoffNew York Supreme Court · 1931
- Hauges v. LascoffNew York Supreme Court · 1931
3Cited by5 opinions
- Magan Medical Clinic v. Cal. State Bd. of Med. ExaminersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
- People v. SchwebelAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1965
- Welling v. BuckNew York Supreme Court · 1945
- Loblaw, Inc. v. New York State Board of PharmacyNew York Supreme Court · 1960
- Russo v. HultsNew York Supreme Court · 1965