Legal Opinion
Hauges v. Lascoff
New York Supreme Court
Decided July 15, 1931PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Lewis, Edmund H., J.
This application for a peremptory order of mandamus presents for decision the single question whether the New York statute requiring the owner of a pharmacy to be a licensed pharmacist is unconstitutional.
The petitioner is a licensed druggist; he is not a licensed pharmacist. The New York State Board of Pharmacy has refused to issue to him a certificate of registration of ownership of a pharmacy in the city of Utica, N. Y., the refusal being based upon the fact *812that he is ineligible to ownership of a retail pharmacy by reason of his failure to bring himself within the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Lawton v. SteeleSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Louis K. Liggett Co. v. BaldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Jay Burns Baking Co. v. BryanSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Weaver v. Palmer Brothers Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- People v. . Beakes Dairy Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1918
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Pratter v. LascoffAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1932
- State v. Peoples Drug Stores, Inc.New York Court of General Session of the Peace · 1934
- In re the Estate of Young, New York County Courts1933